Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Most Commented On
Archives
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (37)
Fat ButOctober 29, 2009
* descriptions of fat used deliberately as shorthand to indicate a character’s villainy, isolation, absurdity, and/or repulsiveness; * books with assumptions about fat people carelessly tossed off as though they are truths rather than opinion. I’ve lived all along the weight spectrum—from thin to quite round—so I have a special awareness of comments about weight in books and how they might be read — and felt — by young people. I’ve noticed over the past fifteen years a steep increase in hit-and-run weight slurs in books, and I wince for the fat kids reading them. All along, they’ve been identifying with characters, lost in the author's world, feeling that comfortable coziness one feels with a trusted writer telling a good story – and then comes some mean-spirited, casual or not-so-casual remark about weight, and it’s as though the author has reached out of the pages of the book and slapped that kid across the face. So, writers and editors, this is my request: please remember that descriptions of weight are just that: descriptions, not evaluations. Questions to ask yourself:
As a reader, I’m disappointed in both the author and editor when I see these things slip past the editorial pen. As a person who cares about the emotional lives of children—both the heavy kids who already struggle so much with disapproval and contempt in their lives, and the less heavy kids unwittingly absorbing society’s message that it’s okay to disapprove of, even despise, people based on appearance and weight—I am truly disheartened by the trend. And as a bookseller, well, I just won’t waste my shelf space when there are so many great books out there. Writers need to be aware of our own books' assumptions. And editors, you've got to help us watch our “and”s, and—you knew I was going there—our “but”s. Posted by Elizabeth Bluemle on October 29, 2009 | Comments (37)
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But EM commented: Elizabeth, this is a great post. I worked on a novel pubbing next spring in which the quasi-father figure is obese. In his case, it's a very specific manifestation of PTSD, and it's used to show the shallowness and prejudice of the main character. Learning to understand Tom's weight is key to Kyle's maturation. But the author and I struggled throughout the editing process to walk the line between plot-necessary weight comments and extraneous, even fetishistic ones. In the end I think we achieved the right balance, but we'll see what the response is.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But LB commented: Thank you very much for this post. It's really an important topic.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Cat commented: This is a great commentary. And to how many other groups does it apply? Are, for example, characters who are religious always living out negative stereotype of that religion? Are the private school kids always portrayed differently than the public school ones? I work with teens and find it interesting how much they make assumptions about stereotypes when their very friends do not live them out, but that is the stereotype that is being reinforced through the media.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Erin Murphy commented: Descriptive, not evaluative. It's so deceptively simple and such an easy test. Thank you!
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But ellen pyle commented: You are soooo right and I hope this blog is widely read! Thanks for the entertaining video-I bet that marriage lasts
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Leigh Purtill commented: A wonderful post and one that I hope readers will take to heart as well. Often we don't realize stereotypes are being reinforced in subtle ways. I dealt with this in my own YA novel which had a plus-size main character. I was very careful to avoid the "but" you mention: Veronica is large *and* beautiful, big *and* talented.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Kat B commented: Did you read the story on the BBC about the woman who was attacked by another grown woman for being fat? As an author, it is difficult not to include my own views of the world in what I write. As an editor, it is important, even vital, for me to evaluate whether or not those feelings relate to the story and the characters within.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Sam M commented: Thank you thank you thank you! This topic isn't addressed nearly often enough.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Megan Frazer commented: This is spot on. Such stereotypes are not only hurtful, but also lazy writing. Thank you for pointing it out.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But dulcinea harms commented: I sincerely appreciate this blog! As a person who has dealt with weight issues all my life, I now see the kids in my life and even strangers and my heart goes out to them. I wish everyone was so sensitive to this issue, and could give it such a voice. Thank you!
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Lori F commented: Hear, hear!- I completely agree! Especially since overweight currently applies to what percentage of American children? How do authors visit schools and look out at their audience when they've said such hurtful comments, no matter how fictionally?
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Starling commented: That was a gorgeous video.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Laura commented: Great post! I am also very sick of the "lose weight and your life will be perfect" story, too. It's time to be a little more creative. I saw Megan Frazer's comment posted up above and I thought her book handled the topic very well.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Jennifer J. commented: It's the lazy writer who stereotypes. Thanks for an interesting post!
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Georgia commented: Bravo, Elizabeth! I hope editors and writers alike take your words to heart.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Carol Coven Grannick commented: Thanks, Elizabeth, for a superlative post on a subject long overdue for discussion. Although the general principle applies to all biases, 'fat' is still an unfortunate, but acceptable and accepted bias in our culture. We do need to speak out against that bias by descriptive rather than evaluative writing. Thank you - so much!
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Daniel Pinkwater commented: My wonderful agent, Jennifer Laughran, directed me to your intelligent remarks, and the comments that follow. All quite correct, but to paraphrase the punchline in a favorite zen story, "it's a pity to [have to] say so." I don't know how many fat characters I've written, sometimes in a book all about questions of fat and fat-prejudice, like Fat Camp Commandos, and sometimes a single passing reference, (but the kids never miss it). The point, for me, is that I love _all_ my characters, and also the readers. I submit if that is the starting point, you can't go very far wrong.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Rasco from RIF commented: Thank you, thank you! You said it all so well, indeed, we must all listen and think hard about all you said. Our children must have no less!
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But shelftalker elizabeth commented: Daniel Pinkwater (!), that is one of the reasons I have always loved your books: the generosity of spirit that drives them is as big as the crazy imagination behind them. I love that you state it so simply: writers, love ALL your characters. Yep, that's pretty much it. (Hey, if you haven't read David Grossman's THE ZIG-ZAG KID, I think you'd love it. There's a large, large-hearted character in it that makes me want to dance around with happiness that she exists. And I am a big fan of Katherine Paterson's Mamie Trotter, too.) Thanks for commenting. That goes for everybody — it's great to know other people are thinking about this stuff. I found the diceytillerman blog really terrific.
October 29, 2009
In response to: Fat But Erin Dionne commented: Stereotypes and (no pun intended) "reductive" descriptions of characters bring down the quality of a writer's work. It is a limiting short cut that diminishes our readers, too.
October 30, 2009
In response to: Fat But Freya commented: World's most obvious example is from Harry Potter, quoting the wiki: "Dudley Dursley is Harry Potter's Muggle cousin,\ ... He was a very spoiled child, and thus became unpleasantly fat and insolent. He often tormented Harry, taking after the example set by his parents. After the humbling experience of running into Dementors in 1995, however, he mellowed and began to be kinder to Harry."
October 30, 2009
In response to: Fat But J commented: Thanks - a great post indeed. I read a brilliant YA book recently where the main character is on the chubby side, but not only isn't this the focus of the book (there are much heavier issues to be considered), he's the clever and funny one with the girlfriend. It's called 'Ostrich Boys' by Keith Gray. It comes highly recommended - was/is on all the big (and small) British award shortlists - and will be published in the US next March. Do look out for it!
October 30, 2009
In response to: Fat But JT commented: Wonderful post, I'm actually working on a graceful chubby dancer book right now! I'll keep in mind the wording, but as a chubster I remember those characters I fell in love with, and how sometimes they disappointed me with image issue problems. Thanks for the post!!
October 30, 2009
In response to: Fat But bookvoodoo commented: Spot on! I evaluate a lot of children's books in my job in youth services at a public library, and I'm amazed at the way less-than-perfect appearance (or even the natural signs of age) has become shorthand for an evil character. One award winning novel included the line that a young man liked his teacher "despite her crooked teeth." Ouch.
October 30, 2009
In response to: Fat But bookvoodoo commented: Spot on! I evaluate a lot of children's books in my job in youth services at a public library, and I'm amazed at the way less-than-perfect appearance (or even the natural signs of age) has become shorthand for an evil character. One award winning novel included the line that a young man liked his teacher "despite her crooked teeth." Ouch.
October 31, 2009
In response to: Fat But elizabeth commented: Great post, important topic. However, I disagree on several issues. - There are many too thin people as bad people as well (think 101 Dalmations)- in general, certain characters are simply features as stereotypes, rather than as people. When writers often wish to develop an image of a persona, then tend to descend into stereotype to create one. You are most correct that its a problem.
October 31, 2009
In response to: Fat But Lara Zeises commented: This is a fantastic post, but I want to offer further food for thought (no pun intended): part of the problem is that too many authors write slender characters that are a "perfect" size 2, 4, or 6. This only enhances the idea that anything above a size 6 is "fat" and therefore "imperfect." (See: the changes to the new Sweet Valley High reissues, in which the originally size 6 twins are now a "perfect" size 2). In my most recent novel, THE SWEET LIFE OF STELLA MADISON, I created a size 8/10 protagonist who not only feels comfortable in her own skin, but also knows she's cute and isn't afraid to work it. It's her confidence that attracts boys to her, not her waistline. If more authors created realistic teens without body image issues, they could affect at least some change in how girls who read perceive themselves.
October 31, 2009
In response to: Fat But Sharon M. commented: Lara, don't you mean, "This is a fantastic post AND..."? J/k
November 1, 2009
In response to: Fat But Erica Perl commented: Great post, Elizabeth. I struggled with this while working on my upcoming book, VINTAGE VERONICA. As the jacket flap states, "Veronica Walsh is 15, fashion-minded, fat, and friendless." I hope readers will understand that Veronica is not friendless because of her size. That said, it would be dishonest to suggest that one's experiences don't play a role. Being treated poorly - for whatever reason - as a child affects how you see the world and writers should resist the temptation to "pretty up" that reality. However, I'm proud to say that Veronica's story of trying to find acceptance has absolutely nothing to do with dieting!
November 1, 2009
In response to: Fat But Sue C. commented: Thanks for starting this discussion, Elizabeth, and of course it applies to any automatic link between appearance and character traits. The dancing clip was fun, but could you also tell me, please, where you found that marvelously round and joyful Buddha image? It made my day.
November 1, 2009
In response to: Fat But Allison A. commented: I read The Very Hungry Caterpillar to a lot of classes earlier this month as part of Jumpstart's Read for the Record. When I got to the line "...he wasn't a little caterpillar any more. He was a big, fat caterpillar", many kids laughed. Sometimes, there was a startled pause before the laughter. I talked about this with the kids after the story: "why is the caterpillar fat? Yes, he's in a chrysalis for two weeks, so he stores up food. Can you think of other animals that store up food?". It surprised me that kids found fatness - for *any* reason, in any creature - laughable, and that none of the teachers called them on it.
November 3, 2009
In response to: Fat But mp commented: Freya, I don't think you are reading the passage the right way. Dursley became fat because he was spoiled and lazy. There are many ways to become fat--genetics, overeating, too little exercise. This seems purely descriptive to me.
November 3, 2009
In response to: Fat But shelftalker elizabeth commented: Hmm, I wrote a reply to several comments a few days ago, and it isn't here. I'll try to remember what I said.
November 3, 2009
In response to: Fat But shelftalker elizabeth commented: Oh, and Elizabeth -- I included the video as a stereotype-buster. So many people seem to think that heavy people are un-athletic or clumsy, I wanted to show a great example of the opposite.
November 3, 2009
In response to: Fat But Sarah Lamstein commented: Fabulous, Elizabeth!
November 4, 2009
In response to: Fat But Colette commented: I won't read any more of Cassandra Clare's series or recommend them since I came across this line.
November 5, 2009
In response to: Fat But Peggy Elam commented: Fantastic post, Elizabeth. I've shared it with many others -- including colleagues in the fat studies and Health At Every Size fields, and plan to refer to it on the submissions webpage of my publishing company, Pearlsong Press. (I'd call us a small press, but technically we're a micro press -- we have to grow to become "small.")
Advertisement
|
|